November 30, 2024

Secure a Microsoft Fabric data warehouse

 Data warehouse in Microsoft Fabric is a comprehensive platform for data and analytics, featuring advanced query processing and full transactional T-SQL capabilities for easy data management and analysis.

Microsoft Fabric data warehouse is a complete platform for data, analytics, and AI (Artificial Intelligence). It refers to the process of storing, organizing, and managing large volumes of structured and semi-structured data.

In a warehouse, administrators have access to a suite of technologies aimed at safeguarding sensitive information. These security measures are capable of securing or masking data from users or roles without proper authorization, ensuring data protection across both Warehouse and SQL analytics endpoints. This ensures a smooth and secure user experience, with no need for alterations to the existing applications.

Microsoft Fabric following security features allows for sophisticated security mechanism at the warehouse level:

Workspaces roles – Designed to provide different levels of access and control within the workspace. You can assign users to the various workspace roles such as Admin, Member, Contributor, and Viewer. 

Item permissions – Individual warehouses can have item permissions assigned to facilitate the sharing of the Warehouse for downstream use.

Data protection security – For more precise control, you can use T-SQL to grant specific permissions to users. Warehouse supports a range of data protection features that enable administrators to shield sensitive data from unauthorized access. This includes object-level security for database objects, column-level security for table columns, row-level security for table rows using WHERE clause filters, and dynamic data masking to obscure sensitive data like email addresses. These features ensure data protection across Warehouses and SQL analytics endpoints without necessitating changes to applications.

Dynamic data masking offers several key benefits that enhance the security and manageability of your data like the actual data remains intact and secure, while nonprivileged users only see a masked version of the data.


-- For Email

ALTER TABLE Customers

ALTER COLUMN Email ADD MASKED WITH (FUNCTION = 'email()');


-- For PhoneNumber

ALTER TABLE Customers

ALTER COLUMN PhoneNumber ADD MASKED WITH (FUNCTION = 'partial(3,"XXX-XXX-",4)');


-- For CreditCardNumber

ALTER TABLE Customers

ALTER COLUMN CreditCardNumber ADD MASKED WITH (FUNCTION = 'partial(4,"XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-",4)');

The Masked data will looks like as: 

CustomerName: John Doe

Email: j*****@contoso.com

PhoneNumber: XXX-XXX-7890

CreditCardNumber: XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-3456

As you can see, the sensitive data is hidden from the nonprivileged user, enhancing the security of your data. 


Row-level security:

This feature that provides granular control over access to rows in a table based on group membership or execution context.

For example, in an e-commerce platform, you can ensure that sellers only have access to order rows that are related to their own products. This way, each seller can manage their orders independently, while maintaining the privacy of other sellers’ order information.

Column-level security:

It provides granular control and allows you to restrict column access in order to protect sensitive data and access specific pieces of data, enhancing the overall security of your data warehouse.

Column-level security can help ensure that sensitive information is only accessible to those who are authorized to see it

November 29, 2024

Automated Severity Assessment of Eczema Using Deep Learning and Computer Vision

 

Project Title:

Automated Severity Assessment of Eczema Using Deep Learning and Computer Vision

Objective:

To develop a deep learning-based system that automatically evaluates the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) from clinical images and patient metadata. This system aims to assist healthcare professionals in remote AD assessment, reducing inter- and intra-rater variability, and enabling telemedicine applications.

Technologies Used:

  • Deep Learning Frameworks: TensorFlow, PyTorch

  • Pre-trained Model: Inception-v4 (or a similar architecture)

  • Programming Language: Python

  • Image Processing and Annotation: OpenCV, Labelbox/Roboflow (for dataset preparation)

  • Metadata Processing: Pandas, Scikit-learn (for feature engineering)

  • Cloud Platforms (optional): Google Cloud, AWS for model deployment and storage

  • Evaluation and Visualization: Matplotlib, Seaborn, Streamlit (for interactive dashboards)

Key Resources:

  • Annotated Image Dataset: Clinical images labeled with eczema lesions, severity scores, and metadata such as age, gender, and medical history.

  • Medical Experts:

    • Board-Certified Dermatologists: To establish reliable ground truth, validate model predictions, and assist with grading the severity of AD.

    • Medical Data Annotators: To manually label and annotate eczema lesions and severity features in the image dataset.

  • Software and Biotechnology Professionals:

    • Machine Learning Engineers: To develop, fine-tune, and optimize the deep learning models for image classification and severity scoring.

    • Computer Vision Specialists: To work on image segmentation, feature extraction, and preprocessing techniques tailored for clinical images.

    • Data Scientists: To analyze metadata and develop feature transformations, as well as evaluate model performance and accuracy.

    • Bioinformatics Experts: To bridge medical knowledge with computational approaches, particularly in handling medical data and integrating biological context.

    • Software Developers:

      • Backend Engineers: To build APIs and manage data flow, as well as integrate the model into a scalable back-end system for deployment.

      • Frontend Engineers: To develop user interfaces for telemedicine platforms or dashboards for healthcare providers, ensuring an accessible and user-friendly experience.

    • DevOps Engineers: To handle cloud infrastructure, model deployment, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines for maintaining the system.

    • Quality Assurance (QA) Engineers: To perform rigorous testing, including model accuracy tests, stress tests, and usability testing, ensuring the solution meets clinical standards.

  • Computing Resources:

    • GPUs/TPUs for model training and inference.

    • Cloud Platforms: Google Cloud, AWS, or Azure, for model deployment, data storage, and scalability.

  • Medical Literature:

    • Research papers and expert guidelines on AD severity assessment for model validation, ensuring alignment with clinical best practices.


System Design & Architecture:

1. Input Data

  • Clinical Images: High-resolution images of eczema lesions from various body parts.

  • Patient Metadata: Includes age, sex, history of AD, history of psoriasis, fever status, etc.

2. Deep Learning Model

  • Image Processing and Feature Extraction:

    • Use Inception-v4 or similar pre-trained model architecture.

    • Preprocess each image and metadata, then feed into separate branches of the model.

  • Metadata Processing:

    • Feature transformation on metadata to create input embeddings.

  • Concatenation and Classification:

    • Combine image and metadata embeddings for final prediction.

    • Use Softmax layer to classify into 27 possible classes, covering various skin conditions like eczema, psoriasis, melanoma, and others.

  • Severity Scoring:

    • A separate regression head or calibrated classifier can provide severity scores specifically for eczema features.

3. Model Training and Validation

  • Development Set: Annotated data for training the model.

  • Validation Set: Data reviewed by board-certified dermatologists for validation.

  • Aggregation and Label Consensus: Use multiple dermatologist assessments to create ground-truth severity scores through an aggregation method.

4. Evaluation Metrics

  • Accuracy: Correct classification of eczema versus other conditions.

  • Severity Score Correlation: Comparison between model and dermatologist severity scores.

  • Inter-rater Consistency: Measure of the model's consistency relative to human ratings.

Implementation Steps:

  1. Data Collection and Annotation

    • Gather clinical images and metadata.

    • Label areas covered by eczema and classify severity features.

  2. Data Preprocessing

    • Segment images (manually or using a human-in-the-loop approach).

    • Normalize image dimensions to (459x459x3).

    • Transform metadata to structured input for the model.

  3. Model Development

    • Fine-tune Inception-v4 for feature extraction.

    • Integrate metadata embeddings by transforming them through feature engineering techniques.

    • Concatenate the image and metadata features and classify into predefined skin conditions.

    • Implement an additional layer for severity scoring using softmax or regression.

  4. Training and Optimization

    • Train the model on the annotated dataset.

    • Use cross-entropy loss for classification and MSE for severity scoring.

    • Optimize hyperparameters (learning rate, batch size, etc.) using validation metrics.

  5. Validation and Testing

    • Evaluate model performance on a hold-out test set validated by dermatologists.

    • Compare model-predicted severity scores with dermatologists’ scores.

    • Fine-tune model parameters based on evaluation results.

Testing Plan:

  • Initial Testing:

    • Ensure input formats for images and metadata are correctly processed.

    • Validate outputs for each stage of the model pipeline.

  • Clinical Validation:

    • Compare model predictions with dermatologist assessments on a validation set.

    • Adjust model to improve accuracy and severity scoring.

  • User Acceptance Testing:

    • Deploy the model in a simulated telemedicine setup.

    • Gather feedback from healthcare professionals on ease of use and assessment reliability.

Future Enhancements:

  • Real-time Telemedicine Integration:

    • Develop a web or mobile application that integrates the model to allow remote consultations.

  • Continuous Model Improvement:

    • Add a feedback loop to retrain the model with additional data from real-world use.

  • Explainability and Bias Mitigation:

    • Implement interpretable AI techniques to make predictions understandable for healthcare professionals.


Food Traceability and Risk Prediction Platform Using Apache Spark and Neo4j

 

1. Title

Food Traceability and Risk Prediction Platform Using Apache Spark and Neo4j

2. Introduction



This project aims to develop a traceability platform for the Food supply chain using advanced analytics and machine learning models. By leveraging Apache Spark for data processing and Neo4j for representing supply chain entities in a graph structure, the platform will enhance traceability, improve supply chain transparency, and provide predictive analytics to manage quality and minimize risks, such as spoilage and logistical issues.

3. Key Business Terms

     Traceability: Ability to track the origin and journey of Food products from farm to consumer.

     Spoilage Risk: The probability of Food becoming unsuitable for consumption due to poor storage, transport, or environmental factors.

     Predictive Analytics: Use of data and machine learning models to forecast potential risks and optimize processes.

     Clustering and Classification: Grouping and categorizing supply chain entities to better understand patterns, quality levels, and risk factors.

     Recommendation System: An algorithm that suggests optimal practices, routes, and partners in the supply chain based on past data and performance.

 

4. Design & Architecture

4.1 System Architecture

The platform architecture includes three main layers: Data Processing, Graph Database, and Machine Learning Models.



     Data Processing Layer: Ingests data from sensors, transactional records, and historical data. Uses Apache Spark for data cleaning, preprocessing, and streaming.

     Graph Database Layer: Neo4j manages the Food supply chain as a graph structure, with nodes for different entities (e.g., Farm, Processing Plant, Distributor) and edges representing relationships (e.g., SUPPLIES, DELIVERS).

     ML Model Layer: Various ML models for prediction, classification, clustering, and recommendation are trained and used to identify potential risks and optimize decision-making.

4.2 Data Flow and Integration

 



  1. Data Ingestion: Collect data from various sources (farms, distribution centers, IoT sensors).
  2. Data Transformation: Use Spark to preprocess, clean, and transform the data.
  3. Storage in Neo4j: Load structured data into Neo4j as nodes and relationships.
  4. ML Model Deployment: Train ML models on historical and streaming data. Store model outputs (e.g., risk predictions) in Neo4j and periodically update based on incoming data.

 

5. Technologies

     Apache Spark: For batch and real-time data processing.

     Neo4j: For managing supply chain data in a graph structure.

     Python: Language for developing and deploying ML models and data processing scripts.

     TensorFlow or PyTorch: For building deep learning models, especially for time series forecasting and classification.

     Scikit-Learn: For simpler ML models (e.g., clustering, decision trees).

     Kafka: For handling real-time data ingestion if streaming is required.

     Docker: For containerizing the platform’s various components for easier deployment and scaling.

6. Implementation

6.1 Data Collection

     Define data sources for data collection from farms, IoT devices, distribution points, and retail outlets.

6.2 Data Preprocessing

     Use Apache Spark to clean and transform raw data into a structured format suitable for Neo4j and ML models.

     Create Spark jobs for batch and real-time processing.

6.3 Graph Database Design

     Define Neo4j nodes and relationships based on the supply chain entities (e.g., Farm, Processing Plant, Distributor, Retailer).

Graph Database Design

The updated design will focus on the traceability of onions rather than eggs:

  1. Define Neo4j Nodes and Relationships Based on Supply Chain Entities

     Nodes:

     Farm

     Attributes: farm_id, location, type (e.g., organic, conventional), owner, certification_details

     Manufacturer

     Attributes: manufacturer_id, name, facility_location, processing_capacity, certifications

     Processing Plant

     Attributes: plant_id, name, location, handling_capacity, processing_methods

     Distributor

     Attributes: distributor_id, name, distribution_centers, coverage_area

     Retailer

     Attributes: retailer_id, name, location, store_type (e.g., supermarket), storage_conditions

     Consumer

     Attributes: consumer_id, location, purchase_date, feedback

     Logistics Provider

     Attributes: provider_id, name, fleet_size, transport_type (e.g., refrigerated), track_and_trace_capability

     Warehouse

     Attributes: warehouse_id, name, location, storage_capacity

     Relationships:

     (Farm) -[SUPPLIES]-> (Manufacturer)

     Represents the supply of raw onions from farms to manufacturers.

     (Manufacturer) -[PROCESSES]-> (Processing Plant)

     Represents the processing of onions for packaging and distribution.

     (Processing Plant) -[PACKAGES_FOR]-> (Distributor)

     Represents the packaging of onions specifically for distributors.

     (Distributor) -[STORES_IN]-> (Warehouse)

     Represents the storage of onions by distributors in warehouses for further distribution.

     (Warehouse) -[SHIPS_VIA]-> (Logistics Provider)

     Represents the role of logistics providers in transporting onions from warehouses to retailers.

     (Logistics Provider) -[DELIVERS_TO]-> (Retailer)

     Represents the delivery of onions to retailers.

     (Retailer) -[SELLS_TO]-> (Consumer)

     Represents the sale of onions to end consumers.

     (Logistics Provider) -[MONITORED_BY]-> (IoT Sensor)

     Represents the integration of IoT sensors to monitor transportation conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity) for onions.

 

 

6.4 Machine Learning Models

Predictive Analytics Models

These models help predict potential risks in the supply chain, such as spoilage or transportation delays.

     Time Series Forecasting Models:

     ARIMA, SARIMA: Useful for predicting temperature, humidity, or demand based on historical data. These models can forecast conditions that may affect the quality of onions, such as fluctuations in warehouse temperatures or seasonal demand changes.

     LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) Networks: A type of recurrent neural network (RNN) that captures long-term dependencies in time-series data. It can help predict conditions impacting onion quality, such as trends in storage temperature or transportation delays.

     Prophet: Suitable for seasonality and trend forecasting, which can predict potential disruptions in the availability or demand for onions.

Anomaly Detection Models

These models identify abnormal conditions that could indicate risks to the quality and safety of onions.Using biosensors we can detect harmful bacteria at different stages in the supply chain (e.g., at farms, processing plants, or retail outlets).

     Isolation Forest: Detects outliers by isolating each point in the dataset. It is useful for spotting unusual environmental conditions, such as unexpected temperature spikes during storage or transportation.

     One-Class SVM (Support Vector Machine): Classifies data as either normal or anomalous. This model can identify unusual sensor readings that may indicate a risk to onion quality, such as excessive humidity.

     Autoencoders: Neural networks that detect anomalies in high-dimensional data, making them suitable for identifying abnormal patterns across multiple sensors monitoring onion batches.

Risk Prediction using Classification Models

These models predict the likelihood of spoilage or other quality-related risks.

 

Biosensors for Real-Time Monitoring: Use biosensors dataset to monitor environmental conditions like humidity, temperature, and microbial contamination in storage facilities. These sensors can send real-time data to the traceability platform, improving the system's ability to detect risks.

Bioremediation Solutions: Using microorganisms to clean up any contaminants in the environment (e.g., soil or water) where onions are grown, thus reducing the initial risk of contamination.

 

Development of advanced molecular techniques, such as PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and CRISPR-based diagnostics, for quickly detecting pathogens like E. coli in onions. These methods can be integrated with the traceability platform to flag contaminated batches in real time.

     Logistic Regression: A simple and interpretable model suitable for binary risk predictions, such as predicting whether an onion batch is at risk of spoilage (yes/no).

     Random Forest, Gradient Boosting (e.g., XGBoost): Tree-based ensemble models that classify risk levels (e.g., low, medium, high) based on factors such as transportation conditions, storage durations, and temperature control.

     CatBoost: Handles categorical data effectively without extensive preprocessing, ideal for mixed data types like batch ID, supplier location, and transport method.

     Use  biological data, such as microbial profiles, that can be integrated with the machine learning models for predictive analytics. This can improve the accuracy of models in predicting spoilage, contamination risks, and other quality issues.

Classification Models

These models help sort batches, identify quality grades, or flag defective products.

     Support Vector Machine (SVM): Effective for binary or multi-class classification, such as categorizing onions based on quality grades (e.g., Grade A, B).

     Decision Trees and Random Forests: Suitable for hierarchical classification of onion batches based on attributes like size, weight, and quality. These models provide interpretability for identifying specific factors affecting quality issues.

     Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): Useful for image classification during visual inspections, such as detecting signs of rot, mold, or other defects in onions. A CNN can analyze images captured during sorting and flag defective onions.

     Naive Bayes: Can classify onions based on categorical attributes (e.g., organic, conventional). It's fast and performs well when features are independent, which is often the case with product attributes.

Clustering Models

Clustering helps group similar batches, identify quality patterns, or segment distributors based on performance.

     K-Means Clustering: Groups onions, farms, or batches based on similar characteristics (e.g., freshness, size, location). Useful for segmenting suppliers and identifying quality patterns among batches.

     DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise): Finds clusters of arbitrary shapes, making it ideal for segmenting onion suppliers or distributors by geographical regions. It can help detect regional quality issues or high-risk zones.

     Hierarchical Clustering: Allows a hierarchical structure in clustering, which can categorize farms based on multiple factors like region, size, and compliance history.

     Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM): A probabilistic clustering model suitable for grouping batches with mixed distributions, such as varying freshness levels in different regions or under different storage conditions.

Recommendation Models

Recommendation models support supply chain decision-making by suggesting optimal routes, suppliers, or practices based on historical data and performance.

     Collaborative Filtering (Matrix Factorization, SVD): Provides recommendations based on patterns in historical data. For example, it can suggest preferred logistic providers or routes to minimize spoilage during onion transport.

     Content-Based Filtering: Recommends suppliers or distributors based on attributes such as certification, proximity, and transport reliability. This model helps in selecting suppliers that meet quality and freshness requirements.

     Association Rule Learning (e.g., Apriori, FP-Growth): Analyzes patterns among different conditions (e.g., temperature ranges or transport durations that correlate with better quality retention). It is useful for optimizing storage conditions or identifying risky combinations of transport and storage conditions.

     Deep Neural Networks (DNNs): Can be used for complex recommendation systems that factor in dynamic elements like real-time sensor data and historical quality incidents. DNNs provide more adaptive and granular recommendations for supply chain decisions.

 

5. Supply Chain Optimization Models

These models help optimize supply chain processes by predicting delays, managing inventory, and minimizing waste, which is crucial for perishable items like onions.

 

DNA Fingerprinting and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS): genomic tracing to identify the genetic signature of pathogens. WGS can help trace the contamination back to specific batches or even the original farm source.

Strain Typing: Techniques can differentiate between strains of pathogens to establish whether cases of E. coli are linked to the same source, aiding the investigation and narrowing down the origin of contamination.

 

CRISPR-Based Gene Editing: Gene editing techniques can be used to create onion varieties that are more resilient to environmental stressors like drought or temperature changes, ensuring better storage and longer shelf life, thus reducing spoilage risk

 

Microbiome Analysis: By analyzing the microbiome of onion batches at different stages, biotechnology can help identify microbial patterns associated with spoilage or contamination, enabling early intervention

 

Optimization Algorithms

     Linear Programming (LP):

     LP can be used to minimize costs or maximize efficiency in various supply chain decisions. For onions, LP can optimize the routing of shipments to minimize transportation costs while considering constraints like delivery deadlines, temperature control, and storage capacity.

     An objective function might be formulated to minimize the total cost of transportation, considering factors such as distance, delivery time, and refrigeration needs, subject to constraints like vehicle capacity and warehouse limits.

     Genetic Algorithms (GA):

     GA can optimize complex problems in the supply chain, such as route planning for delivering onions to multiple retailers while considering varying delivery windows and traffic patterns.

     It can also be used to find the optimal combination of suppliers that balance cost, quality, and reliability, helping to ensure a consistent supply of high-quality onions while minimizing costs.

Inventory Management Models

     Economic Order Quantity (EOQ):

     EOQ helps determine the optimal order quantity that minimizes total inventory costs, including ordering and holding costs. For onions, EOQ can be adjusted based on factors like shelf life, storage conditions (e.g., temperature and humidity), and demand variability.

     The EOQ formula is given by: EOQ=2DSHEOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}}EOQ=H2DS​​ where DDD is the annual demand for onions, SSS is the ordering cost per order, and HHH is the holding cost per unit per year.

     Reorder Point (ROP):

     ROP models determine the inventory level at which a new order should be placed to avoid stockouts. For onions, this model accounts for the lead time, demand during the lead time, and safety stock to handle unexpected demand fluctuations or delivery delays.

     The ROP formula can be given by: ROP=(Lead Time Demand)+Safety StockROP = (Lead \, Time \, Demand) + Safety \, StockROP=(LeadTimeDemand)+SafetyStock

     For onions, factors like spoilage rates and seasonal demand spikes would influence safety stock calculations.

Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) Solutions

     Ant Colony Optimization (ACO):

     ACO can solve VRP scenarios where multiple delivery vehicles need to be routed efficiently. This approach is suitable for distributing onions from warehouses to retail locations, considering constraints such as vehicle capacity and delivery time windows.

     The algorithm uses a probabilistic technique inspired by the behavior of ants searching for food, which helps identify optimal paths for delivery routes to minimize total travel time or distance while ensuring timely delivery of perishable goods like onions.

     Simulated Annealing (SA):

     SA can be used to optimize delivery schedules for onions to multiple destinations. It starts with a random solution and iteratively improves it by exploring neighboring solutions, mimicking the process of annealing in metallurgy.

     For onions, SA can help optimize routes while considering variables like refrigeration availability and traffic patterns, aiming to reduce spoilage and transportation costs.

Inventory Optimization using Time Series Forecasting

     Seasonal Stock Adjustment:

     Models like ARIMA or Prophet can predict seasonal demand variations for onions, helping adjust stock levels proactively. These models forecast demand spikes or dips based on historical sales data, allowing for dynamic stock management.

     Predictions can be integrated with EOQ and ROP models to update inventory policies in real-time, reducing the risk of spoilage during low-demand periods and ensuring sufficient stock during high-demand seasons.

Waste Minimization Strategies

     Perishable Goods Allocation Models:

     Models like First-Expire, First-Out (FEFO) are implemented to prioritize the distribution of onions nearing the end of their shelf life. This approach reduces waste by ensuring older inventory is shipped out before newer stock.

     Predictive Analytics can identify which batches of onions are more likely to spoil based on environmental conditions and historical data. This information can be used to optimize stock rotation practices.

     Multi-Echelon Inventory Optimization:

     This approach manages inventory across different levels of the supply chain (e.g., warehouses, distribution centers, retail outlets). Multi-echelon optimization can be used to balance stock levels, ensuring that onions are available where needed while minimizing total inventory costs.

     Advanced techniques like Stochastic Inventory Models can account for demand uncertainty and lead-time variability in multi-echelon networks.

These models enhance the efficiency of onion supply chains by optimizing logistics, managing inventory effectively, and minimizing waste, contributing to a more transparent and resilient food traceability system.

 

 

6.5 Integration and Deployment

     Integrate Neo4j and Spark to allow seamless data flow between data processing and the graph database.

     Containerize the application components using Docker for scalability.

     Deploy ML models and periodically update predictions based on real-time data ingestion.

7. Testing

7.1 Unit Testing

     Conduct unit tests on individual components like data preprocessing, ML model functions, and Cypher queries.

7.2 Integration Testing

     Test end-to-end data flow from ingestion, processing, storage in Neo4j, and prediction with ML models to ensure all components work cohesively.

7.3 Performance Testing

     Evaluate system performance to ensure it can handle high data volumes, especially for real-time data ingestion and querying in Neo4j.

7.4 Model Evaluation

     Use metrics like accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall for classification models.

     Evaluate clustering models using silhouette scores and adjust the parameters accordingly.

     Measure time series model accuracy using metrics such as RMSE and MAPE.

8. Reports

8.1 Traceability Reports

     Purpose: Provide a visual representation of the entire supply chain journey of each batch of onions, from farm to retailer, including details about every processing, storage, and transportation step.

     Content: Show the path taken by recalled batches of yellow onions, highlighting entities involved (e.g., Taylor Farms, distributors, restaurants like McDonald’s). The report will include timelines and locations, enabling investigators to quickly identify where the onions may have become contaminated.

     Focus Area: The report will emphasize the batches supplied to McDonald's and other affected food service customers, showing all steps before the voluntary recall was issued.

8.2 Quality Risk Analysis

     Purpose: Assess the risk levels for batches of onions based on factors such as spoilage predictions, environmental conditions, and transport data.

     Content: Include risk scores for the batches involved in the recall, evaluating spoilage risk or contamination likelihood based on conditions such as temperature and humidity during storage and transportation.

     Investigation Aid: Use risk scores to prioritize the analysis of batches that may have higher contamination risks, aiding in determining whether slivered onions supplied to McDonald’s were the likely source of the E. coli outbreak.

8.3 Anomaly Detection Report

     Purpose: Identify any anomalies in environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity) throughout the onion supply chain that could contribute to quality issues or contamination risks.

     Content: Highlight unusual readings from IoT sensors during the storage or transport of recalled onion batches. For example, sudden temperature spikes in warehouses or during transportation could indicate potential quality degradation.

     Suggested Actions: Recommend actions to address detected anomalies, such as increasing inspections or adjusting storage conditions for other batches from the same supplier to prevent further contamination.

8.4 Supplier and Distributor Performance Reports

     Purpose: Evaluate the performance of suppliers and distributors based on key metrics like quality consistency, delivery time, and customer feedback.

     Content: Analyze performance data for Taylor Farms and other distributors who handled the recalled onions, identifying any patterns in quality issues. The report will assess compliance with quality standards across different distribution centers.

     Ranking: Rank suppliers and distributors based on their performance history, allowing McDonald’s and other food service customers to make informed decisions about sourcing onions in the future.

8.5 Outbreak Status and Recall Impact Report

     Purpose: Track the status of the ongoing E. coli outbreak investigation and measure the impact of the recall.

     Content: Provide an update on the number of reported cases, hospitalization data, affected states, and the steps taken by Taylor Farms and McDonald’s to address the situation. Include details about the investigation's progress and any new findings related to the potential source of contamination.

     Recall Effectiveness: Evaluate the effectiveness of the recall measures taken, including the removal of slivered onions from McDonald's menus in affected states and notifications sent to other food service customers.

8.6 Visualisations

 




















 



 


 

References

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-s4hr87994

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqsGIjWjiCQ

 

 

Secure a Microsoft Fabric data warehouse

  Data warehouse in Microsoft Fabric is a comprehensive platform for data and analytics, featuring advanced query processing and full transa...